Comparison of different Aethalometer correction schemes and a reference multi-wavelength absorption technique for ambient aerosol data

La importancia de corregir
adecuadamente
los datos del Aethalometer
Atmospheric aerosols
Black carbon
Aethalometer corrections

Jorge Saturno, Christopher Pöhlker, Dario Massabò, Joel Brito, Samara Carbone, Yafang Cheng, Xuguang Chi, Florian Ditas, Isabella Hrabě de Angelis, Daniel Morán-Zuloaga, Mira L Pöhlker, Luciana V Rizzo, David Walter, Qiaoqiao Wang, Paulo Artaxo, Paolo Prati, Meinrat O. Andreae, Comparison of different Aethalometer correction schemes and a reference multi-wavelength absorption technique for ambient aerosol data, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 10: 2837–2850, doi: 10.5194/amt-10-2837-2017

Autores/as

Jorge Saturno

Christopher Pöhlker

Dario Massabò

Joel Brito

Samara Carbone

Yafang Cheng

Xuguang Chi

Florian Ditas

Isabella Hrabě de Angelis

Daniel Morán-Zuloaga

Mira L Pöhlker

Luciana V Rizzo

David Walter

Qiaoqiao Wang

Paulo Artaxo

Paolo Prati

Meinrat O. Andreae

Fecha de publicación

agosto 2017

Doi
Otros detalles

Comparison of different correction algorithms for Aethalometer data.

Abstract

Deriving absorption coefficients from Aethalometer attenuation data requires different corrections to compensate for artifacts related to filter-loading effects, scattering by filter fibers, and scattering by aerosol particles. In this study, two different correction schemes were applied to seven-wavelength Aethalometer data, using multi-angle absorption photometer (MAAP) data as a reference absorption measurement at 637 nm. The compensation algorithms were compared to five-wavelength offline absorption measurements obtained with a multi-wavelength absorbance analyzer (MWAA), which serves as a multiple-wavelength reference measurement. The online measurements took place in the Amazon rainforest, from the wet-to-dry transition season to the dry season (June–September 2014). The mean absorption coefficient (at 637 nm) during this period was 1.8 ± 2.1 Mm−1, with a maximum of 15.9 Mm−1. Under these conditions, the filter-loading compensation was negligible. One of the correction schemes was found to artificially increase the short-wavelength absorption coefficients. It was found that accounting for the aerosol optical properties in the scattering compensation significantly affects the absorption Ångström exponent (åABS) retrievals. Proper Aethalometer data compensation schemes are crucial to retrieve the correct åABS, which is commonly implemented in brown carbon contribution calculations. Additionally, we found that the wavelength dependence of uncompensated Aethalometer attenuation data significantly correlates with the åABS retrieved from offline MWAA measurements.

Citation

@article{Saturno2017,
 doi = {10.5194/amt-10-2837-2017},
 issn = {1867-8548},
 journal = {Atmospheric Measurement Techniques},
 keywords = {Aethalometer corrections},
 month = {aug},
 number = {8},
 pages = {2837--2850},
 title = {Comparison of different Aethalometer correction schemes and a reference multi-wavelength absorption technique for ambient aerosol data},
 url = {https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/10/2837/2017/},
 volume = {10},
 year = {2017}
}